Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is much better than vivo X50's 73 general score. Although Google Pixel 4a 5G and the vivo X50 were released with only 4 months difference, Google Pixel 4a 5G's construction is just a little bit thicker but a bit lighter. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the newer 11 version while vivo X50 has Android 10 version.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a slightly better screen than vivo X50, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen pixels density. Vivo X50 features a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X50 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X50 features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier camera sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X50 also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera and a larger aperture.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G's storage for apps and games is very similar to the vivo X50 one, both have the same internal storage. The vivo X50 features just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.