Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is way better than vivo X50's overall score of 73. Although the Google Pixel 5 and vivo X50 were only released with a couple months difference, Google Pixel 5's design is just a bit thicker but somewhat lighter than vivo X50. The Google Pixel 5 features a slightly better screen than vivo X50, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Vivo X50 and Google Pixel 5 both have extremely similar CPUs, both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. The vivo X50 counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo X50 also counts with a larger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited environments and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Vivo X50 and Google Pixel 5 count with extremely similar storage capacity to install games and applications, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory. The vivo X50 has just a little bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.