Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Titanium |
| -- | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 395 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is way better than vivo X50, having a general score of 92.1 against 73. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has the newer 14 version and vivo X50 has Android 10 version, providing the user a lot of extra features. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a much newer device than vivo X50, but it's a lot heavier and thicker.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with an incredibly better screen than vivo X50, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch in the display, a slightly higher 1280 x 2800 resolution and a bit bigger screen. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a bit better processor than vivo X50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a greater amount of RAM.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than vivo X50, because it has 1 TB internal storage capacity. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design shoots clearer photos and videos than vivo X50, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a higher resolution back facing camera, a bigger aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations, a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and better video frame rates.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with better battery lifetime than vivo X50, because it has a 5600mAh battery size against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.