Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Titanium |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 395 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a global score of 92.1, which is much better than the vivo X50's 73 general score. These phones use Android OS, but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has the newer 14 version while vivo X50 has Android 10 version. Although the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is a lot newer than vivo X50, it is much heavier and thicker.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition counts with a much better looking screen than vivo X50, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1280 x 2800px, a quite greater pixels number per inch of screen and a little bigger display. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition counts with just a bit better hardware performance than vivo X50, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition also has more RAM memory.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a very superior memory for games and applications than vivo X50, because it has 896 GB more internal memory capacity. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition counts with a little bit better camera than vivo X50, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments, better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a back camera with a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has greater battery performance than vivo X50, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.