Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is a little bit better than the vivo X50, having a general score of 77.7 against 73. These phones include Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has an older 5.0 version while vivo X50 has Android 10. HTC One M9's body is somewhat lighter than vivo X50, but it's thicker and was released 6 years before.
The HTC One M9 features a brighter display than vivo X50, because although it has a really smaller display and a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better amount of pixels per display inch. Vivo X50 features a superior memory to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
HTC One M9 has a little bit better processing power than vivo X50, because although it has 5 GB less RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and an extra graphics processing unit. Vivo X50 has a superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
The vivo X50 takes much clearer pictures and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality photographs, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X50 also counts with a way larger aperture and a back facing camera with a much better 48 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.