Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 has a global score of 77.6, which is a bit better than the vivo X50's overall score of 73. The HTC U11 design is a bit lighter than vivo X50, but it's a bit thicker and was released 3 years before. The vivo X50 features a bit better processor than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X50 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
HTC U11 has a slightly better looking display than vivo X50, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel quantity per inch in the display. Vivo X50 takes much better photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the vivo X50 also counts with a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations and a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back camera.
Vivo X50 counts with a slightly better storage to install games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The vivo X50 features a way better battery duration than HTC U11, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.