Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 90.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Huawei |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-10-22 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black and Mystic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2772 x 1334 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 452 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 9000 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A77 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3130 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali G78 MP24 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.78 inches (1/1.28") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Huawei Mate 40 Pro is a lot better than the vivo X50, with a 90.9 score against 73. These phones include the same Android 10 OS. Even being the best phone we compare here, the Huawei Mate 40 Pro is a thicker and somewhat heavier phone than vivo X50. Huawei Mate 40 Pro features just a little better processing power than vivo X50. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The Huawei Mate 40 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than vivo X50, because it has a little better number of pixels per inch of screen, a higher resolution of 1334 x 2772 pixels and a quite larger display. Huawei Mate 40 Pro has a superior storage to install applications and games than vivo X50, because it has more internal memory.
The Huawei Mate 40 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Huawei Mate 40 Pro also counts with faster video frame rates, a much bigger sensor taking way higher quality photos and a camera with more mega pixels.
Huawei Mate 40 Pro has just a bit better battery life than vivo X50, because it has a 4400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.