Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Huawei |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-04-12 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.02 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 970 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2360 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 40.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.56 inches (1/1.78") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design is better than the vivo X50, having a global score of 85.2 against 73. Despite being the best in this comparison review, we must highlight that it is also notably older, just a little bit heavier and a little thicker. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design has newer 9.0 Pie version while vivo X50 has Android 10 version, so it provides you a couple nice extra features and increased performance.
The vivo X50 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X50 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design counts with a little bit better looking display than vivo X50, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a greater pixels amount in each display inch.
The Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design captures clearer photographs and videos than vivo X50, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality, a worse 40 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design features much more memory capacity for applications and games than vivo X50, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X50 has just a little better battery life than Huawei Mate RS Porsche Design, because it has a 5 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.