Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 has a global score of 78.6, which is a little bit better than vivo X50's 73 global score. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the LG V10 has older 5.1 version while vivo X50 has Android 10. Even being the best we compare here, the LG V10 is an a lot older, a bit heavier and thicker phone than vivo X50.
The LG V10 has a much better screen than vivo X50, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Vivo X50 features a better processor than LG V10, because it has 7 more cores and more RAM memory. Vivo X50 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than LG V10, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking less light and dull colors and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo X50 also counts with a much better resolution back camera and a larger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low-light situations.
The LG V10 counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X50, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Vivo X50 features a very superior battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.