Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is better than vivo X50, getting an 82.5 score against 73. The LG V30S ThinQ is an incredibly older phone than the vivo X50, but it is a little lighter and just a bit thinner anyway. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version and vivo X50 has Android 10 version, so it provides lots of additional features.
The LG V30S ThinQ and vivo X50 feature incredibly similar CPUs, and although the LG V30S ThinQ has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit better looking screen than vivo X50, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel number in each inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution.
LG V30S ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X50, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The vivo X50 shoots better photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X50 also has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
The vivo X50 has superior battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.