Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is much better than vivo X50, getting an 81.3 score against 73. The LG V35 ThinQ is an older device than vivo X50, but it is just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter anyway. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than vivo X50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better looking screen than vivo X50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. Vivo X50 shoots much better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a F1.6 aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the vivo X50 also has a bigger sensor which gives a better photo and video quality and a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X50, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The vivo X50 counts with greater battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.