Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is much better than the vivo X50, getting a overall score of 81.2 against 73. The LG V40 ThinQ body has the same thickness than the vivo X50, but it is just a little bit lighter. Both phones we compare here use the same Android 10 OS (operating system). The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a slightly better display than vivo X50, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels amount per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit superior CPU than vivo X50, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. LG V40 ThinQ features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X50, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Vivo X50 has just a bit better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, a smaller sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the vivo X50 also counts with a much better 48 MP resolution camera.
Vivo X50 features superior battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 27% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.