Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than the vivo X50's general score of 73. Even being the best in this review, the LG Velvet is an a little heavier and just a little thicker device than the vivo X50. The LG Velvet and vivo X50 feature very similar screens, and although the LG Velvet has a little bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2460px resolution, they both have the same screen density.
The vivo X50 features just a little better processing power than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X50 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG Velvet has a slightly better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking images and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a back facing camera with a 48 MP and the same (4K) video quality, the LG Velvet also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The LG Velvet features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X50, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has a bit better battery lifetime than vivo X50, because it has a 2 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.