Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Microsoft |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a general score of 85.3, which is better than the vivo X50's 73 overall score. Even though Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is heavier than the vivo X50, it's notably thinner and also newer. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a more recent 11 version while vivo X50 has Android 10, giving lots of additional features and performance optimizations.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a slightly better screen than vivo X50, because it has a bigger display, a higher 1892 x 2688 resolution and a little bit better pixel density. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has just a little better processing power than vivo X50. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The vivo X50 and the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 count with very similar storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both have equal internal memory. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features just a bit longer battery performance than vivo X50, because it has a 4449mAh battery size against 4200mAh.
The vivo X50 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X50 also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.