Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a score of 83.4, which is better than vivo X50's 73 global score. These devices have Android OS, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version while vivo X50 has Android 10, so it provides the user a lot of extra features and enhanced performance. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro design is notably newer than vivo X50's, although it's heavier and thicker.
Vivo X50 features a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit sharper display than vivo X50, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than vivo X50, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera in the back with more MP.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X50, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a little longer battery life than vivo X50, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.