Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than vivo X50, having a overall score of 87.1 against 73. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is a lot newer than vivo X50's, but it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version and vivo X50 has Android 10 version, so it counts with some additional features and improved performance.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better looking display than vivo X50, because although it has a bit worse count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little larger display. The vivo X50 counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has much more memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X50, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit longer battery life than vivo X50, because it has a 7% more battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little bit better camera than vivo X50, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a higher resolution back-facing camera, higher video frame rates and a way larger camera sensor which offers a way better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.