Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-07-24 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z Force has a score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than vivo X50's overall score of 73. The Motorola Moto Z Force body is just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the vivo X50, even though it was released 4 years before. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto Z Force has newer 7.0 Nougat version and vivo X50 has Android 10 version, so it provides the user some extra features.
The vivo X50 features just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bit more vivid display than vivo X50, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better pixel density.
The Moto Z Force counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X50, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The vivo X50 features a much better camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the vivo X50 also has a larger aperture and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
Vivo X50 features superior battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.