Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a score of 77.4, which is slightly better than vivo X50's general score of 73. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play construction is lighter and much thinner than the vivo X50, even though it was released 3 years before. Vivo X50 features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X50 also has more RAM memory.
Vivo X50 features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2376 resolution and a larger screen. The vivo X50 has a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the vivo X50 also has a back camera with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures.
Moto Z2 Play counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than vivo X50, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Vivo X50 counts with a way better battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 40% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.