Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z3 has a general score of 77.6, which is just a bit better than the vivo X50's 73 global score. Although the Motorola Moto Z3 is older than vivo X50, it's design is lighter and a little thinner. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but Motorola Moto Z3 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and vivo X50 has Android 10, so it offers a couple additional features and performance optimizations.
Moto Z3 counts with a screen that is just as good as vivo X50's display, because although the Moto Z3 has a quite smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display. Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X50, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Vivo X50 features a little faster CPU than Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X50 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The vivo X50 has a much longer battery life than Moto Z3, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Vivo X50 takes better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the vivo X50 also has a camera with way more mega-pixels, a larger sensor providing a higher image quality and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.