Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action has an overall score of 78.5, which is just a bit better than vivo X50's 73 global score. Despite being the best in this review, Motorola One Action is an older, somewhat thicker and just a little heavier cellphone than the vivo X50. The Motorola One Action counts with a little bit better looking display than vivo X50, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution.
Vivo X50 has a bit better processor than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 also has more RAM. The Motorola One Action features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X50, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Action also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB.
Vivo X50 features a much better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X50 also has a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Vivo X50 counts with superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.