Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is better than the vivo X50, getting a general score of 87 against 73. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2020) has newer 11 version while vivo X50 has Android 10. Although Motorola razr (2020) is better than the vivo X50, it must be told that it is also a a little heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone.
The vivo X50 has a little more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit better display pixel density, a quite better 1080 x 2376 resolution and a little larger display. The Motorola razr (2020) has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X50, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a CPU that's very similar to vivo X50's processor, they have a Octa-Core processor and a 8 GB RAM memory. Vivo X50 counts with a very superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 50 percent more battery size. The Motorola razr (2020) captures slightly better videos and photos than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing images in poorly lited environments, and they both have a same resolution back camera, the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a much bigger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.