Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 75.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Nokia |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-09-30 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 7.2 is a little bit better than the vivo X50, having a overall score of 75.9 against 73. Although Nokia 7.2 is a better phone than the vivo X50, it must be told that it is also older, just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker. Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 10 operating system, so both should offer all the same operating system features.
The vivo X50 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Nokia 7.2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X50 also has more RAM. Nokia 7.2 and vivo X50 feature similar screens, because although the Nokia 7.2 has a little smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Nokia 7.2 has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X50, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Nokia 7.2 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Vivo X50 has a better camera than Nokia 7.2, because although it has a much tinier camera sensor which gives a way lower photo and video quality, and they both have a back facing camera with a 48 mega pixels, the vivo X50 also counts with a larger camera aperture and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Vivo X50 has longer battery life than Nokia 7.2, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.