Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Nokia |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 has a global score of 80.8, which is better than vivo X50's 73 global score. Even though the Nokia XR20 is newer than the vivo X50, it's notably heavier and extremely thicker. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia XR20 has the newer 11 version and vivo X50 has Android 10.
Vivo X50 features a little better performance than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 also has more RAM. Nokia XR20 counts with a bit sharper screen than vivo X50, because although it has a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bigger display.
The vivo X50 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Nokia XR20, because although it has a smaller sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the vivo X50 also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments and a way better video quality.
Nokia XR20 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than vivo X50, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Nokia XR20 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Nokia XR20 counts with a little longer battery performance than vivo X50, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.