Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a global score of 76.2, which is a little bit better than vivo X50's global score of 73. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 OS, so both should offer all the same OS features. Even being the best we are comparing here, nubia Red Magic 5S is a incredibly heavier and a lot thicker cellphone than the vivo X50.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little faster processor than vivo X50. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a slightly better display than vivo X50, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
Vivo X50 and nubia Red Magic 5S feature extremely similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos, they have equal internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 5S captures slightly better videos and photos than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, it also counts with a much better video definition, a camera with way more MP and a way bigger back camera sensor.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features just a bit longer battery life than vivo X50, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.