Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-24 | -- |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.22 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A16 5G is slightly better than vivo X50, getting a overall score of 76.2 against 73. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A16 5G has the newer 14 version while vivo X50 has Android 10. Even being the best in this review, the Galaxy A16 5G is a somewhat heavier and a little thicker device than vivo X50.
Vivo X50 has a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X50 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A16 5G has a little more vivid screen than vivo X50, because although it has a little worse amount of pixels per inch of screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
The vivo X50 captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with less mega-pixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and videos. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a much greater storage for games and applications than vivo X50, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A16 5G has superior battery performance than vivo X50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.