Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 395 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A20s is just a bit better than the vivo X50, having a 77 score against 73. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy A20s design is older, just a little heavier and a bit thicker than vivo X50. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A20s has the newer 11 version and vivo X50 has Android 10, giving you some additional features and performance improvements.
Vivo X50 features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X50 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The vivo X50 has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution, more pixels per inch in the display and a little bigger screen.
The Galaxy A20s has more storage to install applications and games than vivo X50, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Vivo X50 features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A20s, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Vivo X50 has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because it has a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution camera, a larger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments, a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.