Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 is better than vivo X50, getting an 81.3 score against 73. Both devices in this comparison have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). The Samsung Galaxy A31 design is just a little bit heavier and thicker than vivo X50. Galaxy A31 features a display that's very similar to the display in vivo X50, because although the Galaxy A31 has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Vivo X50 has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X50 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A31 has more memory capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X50, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A31 has longer battery performance than vivo X50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh. Vivo X50 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A31, because although it has a way smaller back-facing camera sensor which provides a much lower image and video quality, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the vivo X50 also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images in low light environments and a lot higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.