Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | -- |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has an overall score of 82, which is better than the vivo X50's global score of 73. Although the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only and the vivo X50 were released only a couple of months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only body is just a bit thicker but also noticeably lighter. These phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a newer 11 version and vivo X50 has Android 10, providing a couple nice extra features.
The vivo X50 features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X50 also has more RAM. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a bit better display than vivo X50, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a very superior memory to store more apps and games than vivo X50, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with superior battery life than vivo X50, because it has a 19% bigger battery capacity.
Vivo X50 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less megapixels, it also counts with a larger camera aperture, a way bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures and a lot better (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.