Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a little bit better than the vivo X50, with a overall score of 79.4 against 73. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's body is incredibly newer than vivo X50's, although it is a little thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has newer 14 version while vivo X50 has Android 10.
The vivo X50 counts with a way better hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a little bit better screen than vivo X50, although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit less pixels per inch of display, they both have a same size display.
Galaxy A35 5G shoots slightly better photographs and videos than vivo X50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a higher resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's memory to install applications and games is very similar to the vivo X50 one, both have exactly the same internal memory. Galaxy A35 5G has superior battery lifetime than vivo X50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.