Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A40 is just a bit better than vivo X50, with a overall score of 79.6 against 73. These devices use Android operating system, but Galaxy A40 has the newer 11 version and vivo X50 has Android 10 version. The Galaxy A40 body is lighter than vivo X50, but it's a little thicker and was released around a year before.
The vivo X50 features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 also has 4 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A40 features just a bit better looking screen than vivo X50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little greater pixel quantity per display inch.
Galaxy A40 counts with a better storage for applications and games than vivo X50, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Vivo X50 has a superior camera than Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, the vivo X50 also has a much better (4K) video resolution, a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos.
Vivo X50 counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy A40, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.