Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 has a general score of 81.7, which is much better than vivo X50's score of 73. The Galaxy A41 design is just a little bit thicker but somewhat lighter than vivo X50, and both were only released 2 months apart. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A41 has a newer 11 version while vivo X50 has Android 10.
Galaxy A41 has a bit more vivid screen than vivo X50, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little more pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy A41 has a greater storage to install applications and games than vivo X50, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Vivo X50 features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A41, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X50 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A41 counts with a little bit better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photographs or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same resolution back camera, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a much larger sensor.
The vivo X50 has better battery duration than Galaxy A41, because it has a 20 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.