Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is better than vivo X50, getting a overall score of 83.8 against 73. The Galaxy A50 is a just a little bit lighter device than the vivo X50, but both are equally thin. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a display that's just as good as the display in vivo X50, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X50, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. The vivo X50 has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X50 also has more RAM.
Vivo X50 features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5% larger battery size. The vivo X50 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same sensor size, the vivo X50 also has a bigger camera aperture for better low light photography, a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.