Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is much better than vivo X50's 73 global score. Even though the Galaxy A51 and vivo X50 were only released 7 months apart, the Galaxy A51 body is a little bit lighter but also a little thicker. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy A51 has the newer 11 version and vivo X50 has Android 10 version.
Vivo X50 features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X50 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A51 and vivo X50 both have incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy A51 has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit better amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A51 captures a bit better photographs and videos than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, a same resolution back camera and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a way bigger sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Galaxy A51 features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X50, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. Vivo X50 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 5% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.