Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than vivo X50, having a 90.8 score against 73. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a more recent 11 version while vivo X50 has Android 10 version, so it provides a couple additional features and optimized performance. Although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is better than the vivo X50, we must highlight that it is also a little bit heavier and thicker.
Galaxy A51 5G has a display that is very similar to vivo X50's screen, because although the Galaxy A51 5G has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite higher pixels amount per screen inch. Vivo X50 counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X50 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than vivo X50, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking pictures and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking way better quality photographs and videos.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a little better battery life than vivo X50, because it has a 7% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.