Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is way better than vivo X50's overall score of 73. Although it's the best in this comparison, it must be noted that it's also a a little heavier and a little thicker device. These devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while vivo X50 has Android 10, counting with lots of additional features and optimized performance.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and vivo X50 both count with extremely similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X50, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The vivo X50 counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X50 also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little better battery performance than vivo X50, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh. The Galaxy A52 5G features a slightly better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot higher 64 MP resolution camera and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.