Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than the vivo X50, getting a 91.1 score against 73. The Samsung Galaxy A52s body is newer, but a bit heavier and a little bit thicker than the vivo X50. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has the newer 11 version and vivo X50 has Android 10 version.
Vivo X50 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52s, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X50 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A52s features a screen that is very similar to the display in vivo X50, because although the Galaxy A52s has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit higher pixel count in each inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a little bit better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a much larger camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Galaxy A52s counts with a much better memory capacity for applications and games than vivo X50, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52s also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with just a little better battery performance than vivo X50, because it has a 7% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.