Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A6 is a little bit better than the vivo X50, getting a 75.8 score against 73. Samsung Galaxy A6's construction has the same thickness than vivo X50, but it is just a bit lighter. The vivo X50 features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2376 resolution, a larger screen and a greater pixels amount in each display inch.
The vivo X50 features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X50 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The vivo X50 captures better videos and photos than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same sensor size, the vivo X50 also has a bigger camera aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations, a much better (4K) video resolution and a way better resolution camera.
The vivo X50 counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X50 has a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.