Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2017) is slightly better than vivo X50, getting a score of 75.8 against 73. Galaxy A7 (2017)'s construction is extremely older, just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker than vivo X50. Vivo X50 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a just a little better pixels quantity in each display inch, a bigger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels.
Vivo X50 has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Vivo X50 has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X50 features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity. The vivo X50 has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a much better resolution back facing camera, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger aperture to take better images in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.