Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 is a little bit better than the vivo X50, with a 76.9 score against 73. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A70 is an older, just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier phone than the vivo X50. These phones work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide the user all the same OS features.
Vivo X50 has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X50 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Vivo X50 features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X50, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than vivo X50, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Vivo X50 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor, the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the vivo X50 also has a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.