Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is better than vivo X50, with an 87.5 score against 73. Samsung Galaxy A71's design has the same thickness than the vivo X50, but it is a bit heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A71 has a newer 11 version while vivo X50 has Android 10 version, so it provides a couple nice extra features.
The vivo X50 features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376px, it also counts with a quite higher pixels quantity in each inch of screen. The vivo X50 has a bit better processor than Galaxy A71, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X50, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 features a little bit better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing images and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a much more megapixels back camera and a way bigger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than vivo X50, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.