Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) has a global score of 79.2, which is a little bit better than vivo X50's 73 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) is a much older and a bit thicker phone than vivo X50, but Samsung managed to make it a little lighter anyway. Vivo X50 counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy A8 (2018) counts with a bit better looking screen than vivo X50, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220, it also counts with a little bit higher number of pixels in each display inch. The vivo X50 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a much higher resolution back facing camera, a larger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments and a much higher (4K) video definition.
Galaxy A8 (2018) features just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than vivo X50, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Vivo X50 counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.