Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a general score of 85.2, which is much better than vivo X50's 73 global score. Even being the best phone in this comparison, we must note that it is also older, just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker. The vivo X50 has a little sharper screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a quite better display density, a little bit larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2376.
Vivo X50 counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X50 also has more RAM. The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much better memory to store more games and applications than vivo X50, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The vivo X50 counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a same size camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the vivo X50 also has a larger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low light environments and a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
The vivo X50 features a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.