Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-07-24 | -- |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Alpha is slightly better than the vivo X50, getting a global score of 76.3 against 73. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Alpha has a more recent 4.4.4 version while vivo X50 has Android 10, so it gives you some nice extra features and enhanced performance. Samsung Galaxy Alpha's design is lighter and thinner than the vivo X50.
The vivo X50 has a bit better performance than Galaxy Alpha, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Alpha counts with a little more vivid screen than vivo X50, although it has a much smaller screen, a way worse resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels and a little bit less pixels per screen inch.
The vivo X50 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the vivo X50 also has a camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution and a much bigger camera aperture to take better captures and video in low light situations.
The vivo X50 features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has more internal memory capacity. Vivo X50 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 126% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.