Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 is better than vivo X50, having an 85.2 score against 73. Both phones we are comparing here include Android operating system, but Galaxy F41 has newer 11 version while vivo X50 has Android 10 version, so it gives you some extra features and optimized performance. Even being the best we are comparing, the Galaxy F41 body is thicker and just a bit heavier than vivo X50.
Vivo X50 has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X50 also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a little more vivid screen than vivo X50, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy F41 features a slightly better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Galaxy F41 features a greater storage capacity to install games and applications than vivo X50, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy F41 features a really longer battery duration than vivo X50, because it has a 43 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.