Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is way better than vivo X50, with a score of 88.1 against 73. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but Galaxy F62 has the newer 11 version and vivo X50 has Android 10, offering some nice extra features and increased performance. The Galaxy F62 is a heavier and somewhat thicker phone than vivo X50.
The vivo X50 features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has 4 more cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy F62 counts with a slightly better screen than vivo X50, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit larger display.
Galaxy F62 counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than vivo X50, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 features a little bit better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much better battery life than vivo X50, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.