Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is a lot better than vivo X50's 73 overall score. Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is older and heavier than the vivo X50, it's body is still a little thinner. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and vivo X50 has Android 10.
Vivo X50 features a bit better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2376 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel number in each screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than vivo X50, because it has more internal memory.
The Galaxy Fold has a little bit better processing power than vivo X50, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Fold has a little better battery performance than vivo X50, because it has a 4380mAh battery size. Vivo X50 has a bit better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors, a tinier aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X50 also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.