Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a global score of 78.9, which is a bit better than the vivo X50's 73 global score. The Samsung Galaxy M20 is a better cellphone than vivo X50, it must be told that it's also older, just a little heavier and somewhat thicker. These devices use the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding OS features.
The vivo X50 has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X50 also has 4 GB more RAM. Vivo X50 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite lower pixels number per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2376 resolution and a bit larger display.
Galaxy M20 has a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X50, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Vivo X50 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a bigger aperture and a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy M20 features better battery life than vivo X50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.