| Global Score | |
| 73 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-07-24 | -- |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Blue, Brown and Green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2400 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.22 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Samsung Galaxy M33 is much better than the vivo X50, with a overall score of 86.3 against 73. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M33 has a newer 12 version and vivo X50 has Android 10. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy M33 is a thicker and somewhat heavier phone than the vivo X50.
The vivo X50 has a little faster CPU than Galaxy M33, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The vivo X50 and the Samsung Galaxy M33 have similar screens, and although the Samsung Galaxy M33 has a quite better 1080 x 2408 resolution and a little bit greater amount of pixels in each inch in the screen, they both have a screen of the same size.
The Samsung Galaxy M33's storage to store more apps and games is very similar to vivo X50's one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X50 shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M33, because although it has a back camera with a lower 48 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy M33 counts with improved battery lifetime than vivo X50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.