Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is much better than the vivo X50, getting a global score of 87.7 against 73. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing, we must tell that it's also a somewhat thicker and heavier cellphone. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS, so they should provide the user very similar operating system features.
The vivo X50 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M51, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X50 also has more RAM. Vivo X50 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel quantity in each inch of display and a little higher 1080 x 2376 resolution.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a little bit better camera than vivo X50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a camera in the back with much more MP and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Galaxy M51 features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X50, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M51 also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy M51 counts with a much better battery performance than vivo X50, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.