Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the vivo X50's overall score of 73. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a just a bit heavier and just a little thicker cellphone than the vivo X50. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 and vivo X50 both have incredibly similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little bit worse pixel number in each inch in the display, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Vivo X50 and Galaxy Note 20 feature extremely similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have equal internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 has a bit faster processor than vivo X50. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy Note 20 features a bit superior battery life than vivo X50, because it has a 2 percent greater battery size.
The vivo X50 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a lot smaller back camera sensor offering a much worse image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X50 also counts with higher video frame rates, a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.